🔗 Share this article

Internationally, nations are investing hundreds of billions into what's termed “sovereign AI” – developing national AI systems. From the city-state of Singapore to the nation of Malaysia and Switzerland, countries are racing to create AI that grasps local languages and cultural specifics.

The Global AI Battle

This initiative is an element in a broader international competition spearheaded by large firms from the US and China. Whereas companies like a leading AI firm and a social media giant invest massive funds, developing countries are additionally making their own bets in the AI landscape.

Yet with such huge amounts at stake, is it possible for developing nations secure significant gains? According to an expert from an influential thinktank, If not you’re a wealthy state or a major company, it’s quite a hardship to build an LLM from scratch.”

Security Concerns

A lot of countries are unwilling to depend on overseas AI models. In India, for instance, American-made AI systems have at times fallen short. One case saw an AI assistant employed to educate pupils in a remote area – it spoke in the English language with a pronounced Western inflection that was hard to understand for regional students.

Then there’s the national security aspect. For India’s military authorities, using specific foreign models is viewed inadmissible. As one entrepreneur noted, “It could have some unvetted learning material that might say that, such as, a certain region is not part of India … Employing that particular model in a defence setup is a big no-no.”

He added, “I have spoken to experts who are in defence. They want to use AI, but, setting aside certain models, they don’t even want to rely on American platforms because data might go overseas, and that is completely unacceptable with them.”

National Efforts

In response, several countries are supporting national projects. One such initiative is being developed in the Indian market, where an organization is working to build a national LLM with public backing. This effort has committed roughly 1.25 billion dollars to AI development.

The developer foresees a system that is more compact than premier models from US and Chinese corporations. He states that the country will have to compensate for the funding gap with talent. Based in India, we do not possess the advantage of investing huge sums into it,” he says. “How do we compete with for example the hundreds of billions that the United States is investing? I think that is the point at which the core expertise and the strategic thinking comes in.”

Local Focus

Throughout the city-state, a government initiative is supporting AI systems educated in south-east Asia’s regional languages. These particular dialects – including Malay, the Thai language, Lao, Indonesian, Khmer and more – are commonly underrepresented in American and Asian LLMs.

It is my desire that the people who are creating these sovereign AI systems were informed of the extent to which and just how fast the cutting edge is moving.

A leader involved in the initiative says that these models are created to enhance more extensive systems, as opposed to substituting them. Systems such as ChatGPT and another major AI system, he says, often have difficulty with regional languages and culture – communicating in unnatural the Khmer language, for example, or suggesting non-vegetarian recipes to Malay consumers.

Creating regional-language LLMs permits local governments to include cultural sensitivity – and at least be “knowledgeable adopters” of a sophisticated system created overseas.

He adds, I am cautious with the term independent. I think what we’re trying to say is we want to be better represented and we want to grasp the features” of AI systems.

Multinational Partnership

Regarding nations attempting to carve out a role in an growing worldwide landscape, there’s an alternative: collaborate. Analysts connected to a respected university have suggested a state-owned AI venture shared among a consortium of emerging countries.

They refer to the initiative “a collaborative AI effort”, drawing inspiration from Europe’s productive strategy to build a alternative to a major aerospace firm in the 1960s. This idea would involve the formation of a government-supported AI organization that would combine the assets of different states’ AI programs – including the United Kingdom, Spain, the Canadian government, the Federal Republic of Germany, Japan, the Republic of Singapore, South Korea, the French Republic, Switzerland and Sweden – to develop a strong competitor to the American and Asian giants.

The lead author of a paper describing the proposal says that the proposal has attracted the attention of AI officials of at least three nations so far, as well as multiple national AI firms. Although it is presently targeting “mid-sized nations”, less wealthy nations – the nation of Mongolia and Rwanda included – have likewise expressed interest.

He elaborates, “Nowadays, I think it’s just a fact there’s reduced confidence in the commitments of this current American government. Individuals are wondering for example, should we trust any of this tech? Suppose they choose to